微软想要全资收购 github

[nannanziyu]

https://venturebeat.com/2018/06/01/microsoft-reportedly-wants-to-acquire-github/

[coderfox]

@applehater 必应的「国际版」和境外访问到的必应是不一样的，本质上是国内版必应的英文增强而已。

[oovveeaarr]

Wunderlist 已经凉了好久了，说起来。

[zifuir]

参考必应搜索。
如果真收购，结果就是搞个大陆特色版，只能访问部分内容

[SilentDepth]

@applehater 不一样吧，搜索引擎面向公众，本地化难度较高，分出两个版本是常见策略，比如百度日本。GitHub 这种东西特意分出两个版本是图什么

[wangleineo]

对 Open Repo 来说，没什么影响。
最关键的问题是 Private Repo，你放心把私有代码库交给微软吗？

[jamiefang]

刚才还看到 Lerna.js 作者指责微软公然盗取开源代码，另起炉灶的行为
https://twitter.com/jamiebuilds/status/1002696910266773505



When we were working on Babel 6, one of the big changes was to split everything up in to nice little plugin packages. However, this created a need to manage dozens of packages. Thus @lernajs was born

One day I came across a new design system from a team at Microsoft. I saw that it was made up of lots of small packages. I was excited and wondered "ooh is MS using Lerna?"

It turns out, no they were not. They were using this other thing called "Rush". I hadn't heard of it, but I was interested in seeing how it differed from Lerna.

I found the repo and started exploring. The first thing I noticed was how familiar all the code was. I could navigate the file structure very easily. I realised that it was almost a mirror of Lerna's code base.

Comparing dates of commits, it looked like Rush kept copying changes from Lerna days after they were made. Rewritten using this weird event system they added.

It left a bad taste in my mouth, I could tell this was my code. I looked at the license, no mention. I looked at the readme... Oh wait

In the readme they acknowledge the fact that there are "other solutions" and say that they are bad. No mention of the fact that Rush was taken directly from one of these bad other solutions.


不仅抄袭，还骂原作者的代码是糟糕的方案。也是够了。。。

[c0pper]

@wangleineo Open Repo 怎么没影响？ go get, homebrew 这些都依赖 github 的服务, 你觉得 M$ 会无差别对待么？

[c0pper]

如果 github 不能保持中立，那就是宣告这种模式的失败。我们迁徙到 gitlab，bitbucket 那么又怎样，不会有现在开心了。

[enihcam]

@jeffpan 也难怪，人上不了外网，又不懂英语，国内媒体鲜有报道，了解不到外面的世界。对微软的认知仍然停在 XP 时代。

[xupefei]

@jamiefang #66 你真的看懂这人在说啥了么？他不满意的是 a ）微软没写给他 credit ； b ）微软说他的方案不好。哪里 “指责微软公然盗取开源代码，另起炉灶的行为” 了？
另外这作者的话有些自相矛盾。前面说 “[Microsoft] R[r]ewritten using this weird event system they added ”，后面又说 “ I could tell this was my code ”。那好，他们到底有没有 “ rewrite ”？

MIT 协议允许任何人另起炉灶。微软做的没什么大问题，只是说别人的方案不好不太厚道。我估计这个人其实就是被这一句话气到了。

[cigarzh]

@zifuir 同意，微软根本没下限的

[liangzi]

@kamen [e-mail] 谢谢

[oska874]

@orangeade linkedin 都快被广告淹没了

[wangleineo]

@c0pper 我觉得微软大概不会像国内互联网公司一样小心眼

[c0pper]

@wangleineo 跟你觉得明君两袖清风一样道理

[c0pper]

V2 上面的人大都靠开源项目吃饭吧？为了好用点的编辑器，方便点的兼容层就把自己的饭碗出卖，又不想想帮你拿到工资的是不是这些工具。

[snw]

微软历史上所有公开的收购在此：
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mergers_and_acquisitions_by_Microsoft

[busfool]

或许还是独立比较好！

[suliuyes]

唯一的担心就是会出个专门的中国版。微软和苹果一直很听话的。

[chuhemiao]

winhub?whub? 感觉如何，23333