卷入 RayBan 品牌侵权案， PayPal 帐号被限制，该怎么办？

昨晚，一封 PayPal 邮件把我搞晕了，说什么涉嫌侵权 Okaley 收到法院禁令导致帐号受限云云。我完全不知事出何因，暂未理会。今天凌晨又收到律师函，回忆半天才搞清了缘由。

大概几个月前，我帮人注册了个域名，过户给他时一时大意没有修改 whois 。没想到这家伙用这域名搞了个 RayBan 在线商店，现在看来很有可能是卖仿冒产品，这不让人家告到美国法院，还殃及到我。

联系 PayPal 只收到封自动回复，估计现在 PayPal 只听法院的。本想联系原告律师，但查看临时禁令发现被告人、相关侵权店铺和域名多达上千，直接沟通指不上了。

域名本就不是我的，目前也不在我账户下，如何仲裁都没关系。现在问题是：

我现在对策是不理会，还是应该采取什么措施？
PayPal 帐号被限，里面没有余额，但绑定的信用卡安全吗？
这案件大概会审理多长时间？据说如果没事 PayPal 180 天会解封？

Dear :

We received a court order on September 1, 2016, affecting your access to your PayPal account due to possible infringement of intellectual properties of Oakley. Until further notice, your ability to send payments, receive payments, withdraw funds, or access the funds in your PayPal account has been limited.

A judgment order may follow and require us to take further actions on the funds in your PayPal account. If you have any questions about this infringement action, it is important that you contact the plaintiff's representative outlined below to respond to this issue:

Greer Burns & Crain attorney@gbcinternetenforcement.net

Court order details Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Plaintiff: Oakley Court case number: Luxottica Group SPA et al v Zilan Ju et al; Case No. 16-cv-8317 NDIL

If you have any questions, please contact us by clicking Help at the bottom of the PayPal homepage.

Sincerely, PayPal

September 1, 2016, , Oakley , , ,

       ,       PayPal                     ,                 ,            :

Greer Burns & Crain attorney@gbcinternetenforcement.net

:U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois :Oakley :Luxottica Group SPA et al v Zilan Ju et al; Case No. 16-cv-8317 NDIL

    ,   PayPal     "  "

, PayPal

We represent Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc., owners of the Plaintiffs' Trademarks, in anti-counterfeiting matters. Plaintiffs have charged you and other Defendants in a Complaint with violations related to trademark infringement and counterfeiting laws. A United States Federal District Court has issued a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) permitting our clients to transfer your domain to our control and/or restrain funds in your PayPal account.

A copy of the Complaint and TRO is available at http://gbcinternetenforcement.net/16-8317, which will be updated regularly throughout these proceedings. You are advised to seek U.S. legal counsel.

If you believe that you have been improperly linked to this case or received this email in error, promptly contact us at attorney@gbcinternetenforcement.net so that we can further investigate your claim.

laxapple

2016-11-25 12:43:53 +08:00

r#9 @sobigfish

忽略我的蹩脚英文，现在看域名已经被仲裁了。

Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2016 9:35 AM
To: GBC Attorney <attorney@gbcinternetenforcement.net>
Subject: Re: Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc. v. The Partnerships, et al.; Case No. 16-cv-8317

Hello,

I ’ m sorry to hear that the Plaintiffs ’ intellectual properties been infringed. After some investigation, I ’ m sure the reason why I ’ ve been linked to this case is related to the domain rb-sunglasses-store.com.

However, I am not the holder of this domain.
Actually, I registed the domain for a customer from my e-shop on 13th May. And it was transferred to him after 5 days due to Name.com ’ s rules. The updated status could be checkout here:
[http://whois.domaintools.com/rb-sunglasses-store.com]

It ’ s the holder ’ s responsibility to keep the whois information updated which isn ’ t been done in time. I wish I could provide any clue but all I have seems to be fake information. I think you could get to the domain registrar or web hosting provider to find out the real person who is supposed to take responsibility.

By the way, my only PayPal account was affected. But I ’ ve never using this account to receive money. All transactions are about payments or subscription services which could also prove that I am not the beneficiary of the infringement act. So could you inform PayPal to cancel the limitation of my account? Thanks.

Regards,
laxapple