阿里云公共 DNS 为什么 IPV4 的表现更优秀？

V2EX = way to explore

V2EX 是一个关于分享和探索的地方

现在注册

已注册用户请登录

这是一个创建于 1116 天前的主题，其中的信息可能已经有所发展或是发生改变。

root@OpenWrt:/etc/config# ping 2400:3200:baba::1
PING 2400:3200:baba::1 (2400:3200:baba::1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 2400:3200:baba::1: seq=0 ttl=117 time=17.769 ms
64 bytes from 2400:3200:baba::1: seq=1 ttl=117 time=17.254 ms
64 bytes from 2400:3200:baba::1: seq=2 ttl=117 time=17.282 ms
64 bytes from 2400:3200:baba::1: seq=3 ttl=117 time=17.398 ms
64 bytes from 2400:3200:baba::1: seq=4 ttl=117 time=17.463 ms
64 bytes from 2400:3200:baba::1: seq=5 ttl=117 time=17.272 ms
64 bytes from 2400:3200:baba::1: seq=6 ttl=117 time=17.289 ms
^C
--- 2400:3200:baba::1 ping statistics ---
7 packets transmitted, 7 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 17.254/17.389/17.769 ms
root@OpenWrt:/etc/config# ping 223.5.5.5
PING 223.5.5.5 (223.5.5.5): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 223.5.5.5: seq=0 ttl=120 time=6.538 ms
64 bytes from 223.5.5.5: seq=1 ttl=120 time=5.857 ms
64 bytes from 223.5.5.5: seq=2 ttl=120 time=5.919 ms
64 bytes from 223.5.5.5: seq=3 ttl=120 time=6.022 ms
64 bytes from 223.5.5.5: seq=4 ttl=120 time=5.883 ms
64 bytes from 223.5.5.5: seq=5 ttl=120 time=5.899 ms
^C
--- 223.5.5.5 ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 6 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 5.857/6.019/6.538 ms
root@OpenWrt:/etc/config#

2 条回复

meisen

2021-12-02 20:10:09 +08:00

看运营商和地区吧，我这边百度的最佳

snuglove

2021-12-03 16:49:14 +08:00

我还是觉的 114 好用.

阿里云公共 DNS 为什么 IPV4 的表现更优秀 ？

阿里云公共 DNS 为什么 IPV4 的表现更优秀？