来自 rsc 的回复。

There are two problems with this GitHub repo:

it claims to host Go standards and does not, in the sense that these are in no way official standards
the project-layout standard it puts forth is far too complex and not a standard
Regarding "why not tell us the standard Go project layout and we'll update the doc?", that only addresses point 2. If there really were standards, they would be in the main Go project doc tree. The standard for project layout would also be a lot shorter. I appreciate your trying to provide a useful resource, but calling it 'golang-standards' is claiming more than it is.

But for the record, the minimal standard layout for an importable Go repo is really:

Put a LICENSE file in your root
Put a go.mod file in your root
Put Go code in your repo, in the root or organized into a directory tree as you see fit
That's it. That's the "standard".

In particular:

It is not required to put commands in cmd/.
It is not required to put packages in pkg/.
It is not required to put web stuff in web/.
It is not required to put APIs in api/.
It is not required to put web stuff in web/.
It is not required to put configurations in configs/.
It is not required to put systemd scripts in init/.
It is not required to put shell scripts in scripts/.
It is not required to put Docker files in build/package/.
It is not required to put CI configs in build/ci/.
It is not required to put deployment configs in deployments/.
It is not required to put test support in test/.
It is not required to put documentation in docs/.
It is not required to put supporting tools in tools/.
It is not required to put examples in examples/.
It is not required to put third_party code in third_party/.
It is not required to put git hooks in githooks/
It is not required to put static assets in assets/.
It is not required to put website data in website/.

The importable golang.org/x repos break every one of these "rules".